Industry
Handwritten mail for charities and not-for-profits
Fundraising is the one sector that never stopped using direct mail, which means donors can spot a fundraising pack from the letterbox. It also means the sector has the clearest view of what a lifted response rate is actually worth.
Thanking is underrated
Most fundraising budgets go on the ask. The list of people who already gave gets a templated receipt and a printed acknowledgement, and then another ask four months later.
A handwritten thank-you costs a few dollars and lands on a list of people who have already demonstrated, with their own money, that they care about what you do. It is the cheapest retention instrument available to a charity, and the one most reliably skipped when budgets tighten.
It also makes the next ask a different conversation. A donor who was properly thanked in March reads the September appeal as correspondence from an organisation that noticed them.
Lists worth writing to, in order
- Donors who gave a significant gift and were thanked by template.
- First-time donors, in the fortnight after their first gift.
- Lapsed donors of two to three years, with no ask attached.
- Regular givers, on the anniversary of when they started.
- Appeal envelopes - handwritten outside, printed contents.
A thank-you and an ask are different letters
The most common mistake is one letter that tries to be both. It opens with gratitude, turns at the third paragraph and closes with a reply slip. Donors read that turn, and what they learn is that the thanks were the preamble.
A thank-you with nothing in it - no slip, no envelope, no mention of the next appeal - is the best-value letter a charity can post. The list is people who have already given, the cost is one short letter, and the only thing that can spoil it is an ask. Be honest about the trade-off, though: it raises nothing this month, and its effect shows in the next appeal rather than in its own reply rate.
Major donors are the clearest case. The largest gifts usually come from a list small enough to name, which is stewardship rather than mailing: a letter from someone the donor could plausibly meet, saying what the gift did and asking for nothing. The catch is volume - forty major donors is below the 100-piece minimum, and forty letters is a job for someone in the office with a good pen. Thanking at volume is where it becomes ours.
The lapsed donor file, which most charities leave alone
Every charity has a list of people who gave two or three times and then stopped. They did not object and they did not tell anyone - the direct debit ended, or an appeal arrived at a bad moment, and nothing followed. That file is usually larger than the active one and is almost always worked less.
It is the same problem a business has with lapsed customers, and it responds to the same treatment: a letter naming what their giving actually did, acknowledging the gap without making it awkward, asking for nothing the first time. The reactivation page covers the arithmetic and the sequencing, and keeping people from drifting is cheaper than replacing them.
Two things are specific to donor files. Write to someone who gave to a programme about that programme - they did not become a general supporter by accident. And check the file against the deceased register first, because a letter to a family who notified you of a death two years ago is the worst mail a charity can send.
What the sector benchmark says
Fundraising is the strongest-performing category in the response-rate series, and the reason is the same one that runs through everything on this page: charities mail people who have already given, and that is the highest-responding list any sender has.
- Nonprofit and fundraising mail
- 5–9%
- House list - people who have already bought from you or given you their details
- 5–9%
- Prospect list - cold names who have no relationship with you
- 2.0–4.4%
These are United States figures, self-reported by the marketers who ran the campaigns, and there is no equivalent Australian series. Treat them as the shape of the thing rather than a forecast of your result - the honest use is to compare channels and list types against each other, not to predict a number for your campaign.
Look at the first two rows together: the nonprofit figure and the house-list figure are the same band. That is not a coincidence - the sector benchmark is high because the sector mails its own donor file, so it is a house-list number wearing a sector label. It belongs to any charity with a warm file, and it is an argument for that file rather than for acquisition.
Postage is where the money is
For a charity mailing, postage is frequently the largest line in the budget, and Australia Post has a specific pricing structure for endorsed organisations that materially changes the sums.
Charity Mail offers lower prices for fundraising or promotional mailings of 300 items or more, to income tax exempt charities and DGR-endorsed organisations, with a choice between Priority and a cheaper Regular timetable. Bulk mail discounts start from 300 letters generally, and Promo Post from 4,000 barcoded letters. Details and current rates are on the Australia Post bulk mail pages.
One consequence worth planning around: qualifying for the cheapest rates usually requires barcoding and a machine-readable address block, which sits awkwardly with a fully handwritten envelope. It is a genuine trade-off, and it is worth costing both ways before you commit. A full breakdown of Australian direct mail costs.
When this is the wrong answer
Most charities report a cost-of-fundraising figure to a board, and some publish one. Handwriting costs more per piece than a printed appeal, and that cost sits in the ratio whether the letter raises anything or not - so a thank-you run with no ask makes the number look worse in the year you send it and better afterwards, if it works.
Two things make it defensible. Use it where the gift size justifies it - obviously worth a few dollars for a donor giving hundreds, obviously not for a one-off tin-rattle. And use it for thanking rather than asking. If your average gift is twenty-five dollars and the file is twenty thousand names, handwriting is the wrong instrument and the ratio will say so correctly.
We will not tell you what an acceptable ratio is; that is a question for your board, not your supplier. What we will say is that cold acquisition is the clearest wrong answer of all: writing by hand to people who have never given you anything is the most expensive way to run an acquisition mailing.
Typical costs
An 80-word handwritten thank-you in a handwritten envelope. Envelope alone is $0.78 a piece if the contents are printed.
| Quantity | Per piece | Campaign total | Volume tier |
|---|---|---|---|
| 300 | $3.01 | $995 | 250+ pieces |
| 1,000 | $2.54 | $2,797 | 1,000+ pieces |
| 5,000 | $2.26 | $12,455 | 5,000+ pieces |
| 20,000 | $2.22 | $48,867 | 10,000+ pieces |
Indicative only, including GST, 80 words per piece, with a handwritten envelope, excluding postage. Full pricing and calculator.
A year of gifts above a major-gift threshold - say 1,000 of them - is about $2.54 a piece, $2,542 before postage and GST.
Questions from fundraisers
Is Charity Mail cheaper than ordinary postage?
Yes, for organisations that qualify. Australia Post offers Charity Mail pricing to income tax exempt charities and organisations endorsed as deductible gift recipients, for fundraising or promotional mailings of 300 items or more, with a choice of Priority or a lower-cost Regular timetable. Whether your organisation qualifies is a question for Australia Post, and it is worth resolving before you cost a campaign.
Should the thank-you be handwritten or the ask?
Thank-you first, every time. It is the cheaper list, the response is more reliable, and it changes the next ask more than any amount of copywriting will. Charities that get thanking right rarely need to work as hard on asking.
Can volunteers’ signatures go on the letters?
Yes, with their written consent. A letter signed by a service user, a volunteer or a board member reads very differently from one signed by the fundraising department.
Does handwriting look wasteful to donors?
It is a fair concern and worth thinking about rather than dismissing. Handwriting a mass acquisition appeal to 50,000 cold prospects can read as extravagant. Handwriting a thank-you to 400 people who each gave a meaningful amount reads as respect. The difference is whether the recipient can see why they specifically received it.
How soon after the gift should a handwritten thank-you arrive?
Inside a fortnight, which in practice means batching rather than waiting for a quarterly run. There is no integration with any CRM or donor database, so the workable pattern is a weekly or fortnightly export of gifts above whatever threshold you set. The minimum run is 100 pieces, so a smaller charity will usually be batching monthly instead.
Should a handwritten thank-you include a reply envelope?
No. A reply envelope is an ask wearing a hat, and the donor will read it as one. If the letter is doing its job the next appeal is where the ask goes, and putting one in the thank-you spends the goodwill you just paid to create.
Keep reading
Handwritten envelopes
Addressed envelopes written by hand with a real pen, with or without the letter inside. The c…
Handwritten letters
A handwritten letter service for Australian businesses. Real ballpoint on real paper, from 10…
Direct mail costs
Postage, bulk lodgement, print, data and production, with current Australia Post rates and th…
Pricing
Work out an indicative per-piece and total cost for a handwritten campaign. Change quantity, …
Envelope marketing
The envelope decides whether anything inside gets read. What handwriting on the outside chang…
Thank-you cards
Business thank-you cards written with a real pen - after a purchase, a referral, a donation o…
Start with last year's major donors
Everyone who gave above your major-gift threshold and got a templated receipt. Tell us the number and we will price a proper thank-you.